Литий вроде в биохакинге не менее важен. И причины дефицита отчасти схожи. Только вот это: "курени… — Андрей С на vc.ru

Почему спортсмены принимают магний и надо ли его принимать тем, кто работает головой?

Если у вас: нарушен сон, усталость, стресс, судороги, то стоит посмотреть в сторону магния. Подробно разберёмся надо ли принимать магний тем, кто трудится интеллектуально или тем, кто продлевает жизнь и молодость (биохакерам). А также о симптомах недостатка магния.

Читать далее

1616

Андрей С

Литий вроде в биохакинге не менее важен. И причины дефицита отчасти схожи.

Только вот это:
"курении, психоделиков и т. п. расход магния увеличивается. Причина — повышенное выведение разных веществ через почки"
Жесткие стимуляторы, на основе амфетамина и метамфетамина (лекарственного "бензедрина" и других аналогов применяющихся в медицине) это еще понятно, через резкое кратковременное повышение общей активности, особенно при передозировке. А как психоделики то? И курение (табака)? Тем более через почки.

1

Ответить

Автор

Да, про литий стоит отдельно написать, вы правы.

Про взаимосвязь с курением - это вывод из материалов по другим витаминам и минералам, так как курение ухудшает пищеварительные функции и усвоение веществ ухудшается.
Условно говоря, из одной порции еды курильщик усвоит меньше веществ, чем он же, но если бы не курил.
Можно погулить эту тему на пабмеде, по быстрому про минералы, например, вот
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02390832

link.springer.com

A meta-analysis of the effects of cigarette smoking on bone mineral density - Calcified Tissue International

To determine the magnitude and mediators of the association between cigarette smoking and bone mass in the epidemiologic literature we reviewed articles, published abstracts and conference proceedings, identified through MEDLINE, psychological abstracts, conference proceedings, and article bibliographies. We studied cross-sectional and prospective human studies that provided a quantitative measure of bone mass (X-ray, absorptiometry, or computed tomography) as a function of cigarette smoking exposure. Effects were expressed as pooled standardized mean differences for categorical comparisons (e.g. bone mass in current versus nonsmokers), and as pooled correlation coefficients for continuous comparisons (e.g., correlation of bone mass and pack-years of smoking). Effects were derived for combined bone sites (all bone sites pooled within each study) and four specific sites (hip, lumbar spine, forearm, and os calcis), and were examined overall and as a function of subject and methodologic characteristics (gender, age, body weight, menopausal status, health status). Data were pooled across 86 studies, enrolling 40, 753 subjects. Smokers had significantly reduced bone mass compared with nonsmokers (never and former smokers) at all bone sites, averaging a one-tenth standard deviation (SD) deficit for combined sites. Deficits were especially pronounced at the hip, where the bone mass of current smokers was one-third of a SD less than that of never smokers. Overall, effects were greatest in men and in the elderly, and were dosedependent. In prospective studies, smokers had greater rates of bone loss over time compared with nonsmokers. Bone mass differences remained significant after controlling for age and body weight differences between the two groups. Absolute effect sizes at most bone sites were greatest for current smokers compared with never smokers, intermediate for current smokers compared with former smokers, and lowest for former smokers compared with never smokers, suggesting that smoking cessation may have a positive influence on bone mass. Based on these data, it is estimated that smoking increases the lifetime risk of developing a vertebral fracture by 13% in women and 32% in men. At the hip, smoking is estimated to increase lifetime fracture risk by 31% in women and 40% in men. It appears that smoking has an independent, dose-dependent effect on bone loss, which increases fracture risk, and may be partially reversed by smoking cessation. Given the public health implications of smoking on bone health, it is important that this information be incorporated into smoking prevention and cessation efforts

1

Ответить